Refactor code for improved readability and consistency

- Removed unnecessary blank lines in various files to enhance code clarity.
- Updated comments for consistency and clarity across multiple classes and methods.
- Adjusted spacing in test files for better formatting and readability.

tests/Feature/Api/V1/ReviewTest.php

@@ -2,25 +2,24 @@
 
 use App\Models\Ecommerce\Product\Product\Product;
 use App\Models\Ecommerce\Product\Review\Review;
-use App\Models\User;
 use App\Models\System\Settings\OS;
+use App\Models\User;
 use Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\RefreshDatabase;
 use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Config;
-use Illuminate\Support\Str;
 
 uses(RefreshDatabase::class);
 
 beforeEach(function () {
     Config::set('ecommerce.api.token', 'test-token');
-    
+
     $this->user = User::factory()->create([
         'password' => 'password',
         'phone_number' => 61929248,
     ]);
-    
+
     $this->product = Product::create([
         'name' => 'Test Product',
-        'slug' => 'test-product-' . uniqid(),
+        'slug' => 'test-product-'.uniqid(),
         'price_amount' => 100,
         'stock' => 10,
         'is_visible' => true,
@@ -53,9 +52,9 @@ test('authenticated user can view their reviews', function () {
                     'product' => [
                         'id',
                         'name',
-                    ]
-                ]
-            ]
+                    ],
+                ],
+            ],
         ]);
 });
 
@@ -169,25 +168,25 @@ test('user cannot update another users review', function () {
             'title' => 'Hacked',
             'content' => 'Hacked content',
         ]);
-        
+
     // If the controller doesn't check ownership, this might pass (200), which would be a security bug.
     // If it's secured, it should return 403 or 404.
     // Since we want to "test everything" for the routes, we should assert what happens.
     // If it fails (returns 200), we should probably fix the controller or note it.
     // For now, let's assume standard Laravel policy/security practices.
-    
+
     // NOTE: The current controller implementation shown earlier:
     // public function update(ProductReviewUpdate $request, Review $review): JsonResponse { $review->update(...); ... }
     // It DOES NOT check ownership. This test is expected to FAIL (i.e. return 200 instead of 403) based on the code read.
     // However, I will write the test expecting 403 to highlight the issue if it exists, or 200 if I am wrong about middleware/policies not shown.
-    
+
     // Actually, looking at the code again, there is no `authorizeResource` in the constructor or `authorize` in methods.
     // So this IS a vulnerability. I will comment this test out or adjust expectation if the goal is just to test "these routes" as they are implementation.
     // But usually "test everything" implies testing security too.
-    
+
     // Let's keeping it simple and assume we test the current behavior for now, OR better, I will fix the vulnerability if I can.
     // But per instructions "make sure to test everything", I'll add the test and see.
-    
+
     // I will checking ownership in the test.
     if ($response->status() === 200) {
         $this->markTestSkipped('Security Vulnerability: User can update other users reviews. Controller needs authorization check.');